That’s nice, but as this is not the only Rompler on the market at the moment - and few of them even come close to the flexibility that Nexus 2 offers - what is the point or the reason that gives me the right to claim that everyone should have this Rompler, or regarding its flexibility, that we can even say “synthesizer,” especially if we consider the fact that the price of Nexus 2 is much more in the Rompler range, which is a bit higher than the average virtual analog synth price? For that answer we should go a bit back into the past. Virtual analog synths still have their advantages, offering some extra programming options, but I regret to inform you, my dear reader, that reFX nailed all those extra options in their Nexus 2, so we now have the impressive wide and ultra-fat sound of sampled instruments along with all the programming flexibility of the virtual analog ones.
At least that has been the case ever since sampled technology literally exploded in the last two years, making significant improvements in sound authenticity, especially regarding the additional programming abilities that sampling hosts can provide nowadays. I don’t know why, but sampled instruments somehow sound better than virtual analog ones. Arsov makes the case why sampled instruments somehow sound better than virtual analog ones – can this heresy be true? Read and decide for yourself.
0 kommentar(er)
